Use of SGLT2 Inhibitors vs GLP-1 RAs and Anemia in Patients With Diabetes and CKD.

Importance: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are associated with lower anemia risk, based on findings from post hoc analyses of the CREDENCE and DAPA-CKD trials; however, the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in a more generalizable type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) population, with active comparisons pertinent to current practice, is unknown. Objective: To evaluate and compare anemia incidence between SGLT2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) among patients with T2D and CKD stages 1 to 3. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used target trial emulation of an expanded CREDENCE and DAPA-CKD study framework. The study was conducted among adults with T2D and CKD initiating SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 RAs between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, with follow-up until December 31, 2022. The study was conducted at the Chang Gung Medical Foundation, the largest multi-institutional hospital system in Taiwan. Exposures: Initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 RAs. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of anemia outcomes, including anemia event occurrence (hemoglobin level <12-13 g/dL or International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes) or anemia treatment initiation. Changes in hematological parameters, including hemoglobin level, hematocrit level, and red blood cell count, were evaluated during the follow-up period for as long as 3 years. Results: The cohort included a total of 13 799 patients with T2D and CKD, initiating SGLT2 inhibitors (12 331 patients; mean [SD] age, 62.4 [12.3] years; 7548 [61.2%] male) or GLP-1 RAs (1468 patients; mean [SD] age, 61.5 [13.3] years; 900 [61.3%] male). After the median follow-up period of 2.5 years, patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors had lower incidence of composite anemia outcomes (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.90) compared with those receiving GLP-1 RAs. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower incidence of anemia events (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.87) but not with a lower rate of anemia treatment initiation (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.19). Changes in hematological parameters for SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs throughout the 3-year follow-up period supported the primary analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multi-institutional cohort study with target trial emulation, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of composite anemia outcomes, especially anemia event occurrences. SGLT2 inhibitors may be considered as an adjunct therapy to reduce anemia incidence in patients with T2D and CKD.

Denosumab and the Risk of Diabetes in Patients Treated for Osteoporosis.

Importance: Denosumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL), is a widely used antiresorptive medication for osteoporosis treatment. Recent preclinical studies indicate that inhibition of RANKL signaling improves insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance, and ß-cell proliferation, suggesting that denosumab may improve glucose homeostasis; however, whether denosumab reduces the risk of incident diabetes remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate whether denosumab use is associated with a lower risk of developing diabetes in patients with osteoporosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, propensity score-matched cohort study used administrative data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Adult patients who received denosumab for osteoporosis therapy in Taiwan between 2012 and 2019 were included. To eliminate the inherent bias from confounding by indication, the patients were categorized into a treatment group (34 255 patients who initiated denosumab treatment and adhered to it) and a comparison group (34 255 patients who initiated denosumab treatment but discontinued it after the initial dose) according to the administration status of the second dose of denosumab. Propensity score matching was performed to balance patient characteristics and to control for confounders. Exposure: Treatment with denosumab. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was incident diabetes requiring treatment with antidiabetic drugs. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for incident diabetes. Data were analyzed from January 1 to November 30, 2023. Results: After propensity score matching, 68 510 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 77.7 [9.8] years; 57 762 [84.3%] female). During a mean (SD) follow-up of 1.9 (1.6) years, 2016 patients developed diabetes in the treatment group and 3220 developed diabetes in the comparison group (incidence rate, 35.9 vs 43.6 per 1000 person-years). Compared with the comparison group, denosumab treatment was associated with a lower risk of incident diabetes (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.90). Several sensitivity analyses also demonstrated similar results of lower diabetes risk associated with denosumab treatment. Conclusions and relevance: The results from this cohort study indicating that denosumab treatment was associated with lower risk of incident diabetes may help physicians choose an appropriate antiosteoporosis medication for patients with osteoporosis while also considering the risk of diabetes.